Zim included on Worst of Worst list

http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk
Tel/Fax: 02380 879675
General: 07714736382
P O Box 248, Hythe, SO45 4WX, United Kingdom


NEW YORK – Zimbabwe is included in the latest Freedom House Worst of the Worst list: The World’s Most Repressive Societies 2006 - an annual compilation of the most dictatorial regimes in the world. The organization’s executive director testified last week before the United States Congress and called on the UN Human Rights Council to address abuses in the countries listed.
The report, which is intended to assist the new Human Rights Council, as well as members of Congress, journalists and other policymakers, includes detailed descriptions of the dire human rights situations in eight countries judged to have the worst records in the past year. These countries are Burma, Cuba, Libya, North Korea, Sudan, Syria, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Also included are two territories, Chechnya and Tibet, whose inhabitants suffer intense repression.
In addition, The Worst of the Worst includes nine other countries near the bottom of Freedom House’s list of the most repressive: Belarus, China, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Laos, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, and Zimbabwe. The territory of Western Sahara is also included in this group. While these states scored slightly better than the “worst of the worst,” they offer very limited scope for political discussion and activity.
“This report should be viewed as the minimal ‘to do’ list to be addressed by members of the UN Human Rights Council and those governments that profess to care about human rights,” Jennifer Windsor, Executive Director of Freedom House, told members of the House International Relations Committee’s Subcommittee on Africa, Human Rights and Global Operations. “The Council urgently needs to prove that it can and will act in a constructive manner in furtherance of its mandate, and will be judged on its willingness and ability to take action to address country and situation-specific human rights violations,” she added.
The UN Human Rights Council was established this year as a replacement for the much-criticized UN Commission on Human Rights, and met for the first time in June. A number of decisions, including the establishment of a working group to determine guidelines for a new Universal Periodic Review, were taken at the meeting. However, despite the human rights crises that exist in places like North Korea, Darfur, Uzbekistan, and elsewhere, the Council has only exercised its authority for country specific action in two special sessions focusing on situations in Gaza and Lebanon, and then passed resolutions widely seen in the human rights community as unbalanced condemnations of Israel without reference to human rights violations by Hamas or Hizbollah or the states that support them. - www.kubatana.net